
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been identified in multiple types of tissue and exhibit characteristic self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation abilities. However, the possibility of oncogenic transformation after transplantation is concerning. In this study, we investigated the tumorigenic potential of umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (hUCB-MSCs) relative to MRC-5 and HeLa cells (negative and positive controls, respectively) both
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been identified in multiple types of tissue including bone marrow, umbilical cord, and adipose (1). They came to prominence as a potential source of stem cells for cellular and genetic therapies due to their inherent abilities of self-renewal, proliferation, and functional multi-lineage differentiation (i.e., bone, cartilage, neurons, adipocytes, and cardiomyocytes). Clinical use of MSCs is emerging, providing valuable insight into regenerative medicine and tissue engineering (2?6).
However, therapeutic applications of MSCs are limited, owing to concerns that they could be prone to malignant transformation. It was reported that
Therefore, the tumorigenic potential of MSCs is a major concern in clinical applications, and regulatory guidelines recommend evaluating their tumorigenicity using immunocompromised animals to assess stem cell safety (9). To use MSCs safely in stem cell therapy in humans, it is important to determine whether human MSCs progress to malignant transformation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential malignant transformation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) using
hUCB-MSCs were provided by Kang Stem Biotech (Seoul, Korea) and maintained as previously reported (10). Cells at passage 6 were used for all experiments (11). To compare the
To examine tumorigenicity
To evaluate tumorigenicity
Mice were divided randomly into four groups of six. Vehicle control (EMEM), hUCB-MSCs, MRC-5 cells, and HeLa cells (1 × 107 cells/head) were inoculated subcutaneously once into the lateral trunk region. After inoculation, mice were observed for 13 weeks twice daily for clinical signs and twice weekly for the presence of tumors. Tumor dimension was assessed using a vernier caliper, and tumor size was estimated using the following equation: ½ × minor axis2 × major axis. Body weight was measured once weekly throughout the study period.
Thirteen weeks after inoculation, animals were fasted overnight and necropsied under deep isoflurane inhalation anesthesia. Blood samples were collected from the posterior vena cava of animals for hematologic analysis. Complete gross examinations were conducted on all animals. Organs including the liver, brain, spleen, heart, kidney, adrenal gland, and lung were collected and weighed. In addition, relative organ weights were calculated as the ratio of organ weight-to-fasted body weight before necropsy.
Routine hematological examinations were conducted using blood with EDTA-2K, an anticoagulant, on a hematological auto-analyzer (ADVIA120 Hematology System, Bayer, USA) to assess: white blood cell (WBC) count, red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin (HGB) concentration, hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelets (PLT), differential leukocyte count (neutrophil (NEU), lymphocyte (LYM), monocyte (MON), eosinophil (EOS), basophil and large unstained cell (BAS) and reticulocyte count (RET).
The organs collected for histopathology including the kidney, liver, spleen, heart, brain, lung, adrenal gland, mandibular lymph node, stomach, mesenteric lymph node, pancreas, thoracic cavity, skin, and injection site were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. Fixed organs from all animals were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and examined under a microscope.
To determine whether inoculated hUCB-MSCs persisted at the injection site and whether tumor formation in HeLa cell-treated mice originated from inoculated cells, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on injection site tissues or observed tumor tissues of animals from each group using an automated staining system (DISCOVERY XT, Ventana, Tucson, USA). Heat-induced epitope retrieval was applied using citrate-based buffer (pH 6.0). Sections were incubated with an anti-human mitochondria mouse monoclonal antibody (1 : 1000, ab92824, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 2 hr. For detection, diaminobenzidine chromogen was used and counterstained with hematoxylin.
The data were examined for variance homogeneity using Bartlett’s test. When Bartlett’s test indicated no significant deviations from variance homogeneity, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed at α = 0.05. When significance was noted, Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons was conducted to determine which pairs were significantly different. When pairs of group homogeneity were observed, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis comparison test was conducted. When a significant difference was observed in the Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s Rank Sum test was conducted to determine the specific pairs of group comparison. Statistical analyses were performed using the PATH/TOX System (Version 4.2.2, Xybion Co., Cedar Knolls, USA). Significance was set as
To compare colony formation of hUCB-MSCs with HeLa and MRC-5 cells, we performed the soft agar colony assay using 1 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well plate. hUCB-MSCs showed a notably lower ability to form colonies than HeLa cells (positive control). The vehicle control and MRC-5 groups did not form colonies (Fig. 1).
No significant body weight changes were observed in any of the groups during the experimental period (Fig. 2). Upon clinical observation, mice treated with hUCB-MSCs or MRC-5 cells had no clinical signs, but HeLa cell-treated mice exhibited swollen skin (6/6), a palpable mass (6/6), and hard skin (1/6) with an increased tumor volume during the experimental period (Fig. 3). Upon hematologic evaluation, there were no meaningful differences between control and hUCB-MSC-treated groups (Table 1). There were no treatment-related findings according to macroscopic examination in the vehicle control, MRC-5-, or hUCB-MSC-treated mice (Table 2). Microscopic examination revealed no tumors in the vehicle control, MRC-5, or hUCB-MSC-treated groups. However, all mice inoculated with HeLa cells developed tumors at the injection site, with one case presenting metastasis to the thoracic cavity (Table 2, Table 3). The tumor lesions presented mitotic figures, necrosis, and rounded or pleomorphic cells with hyperchromatic nuclei (Fig. 4). In addition, extramedullary hemopoiesis with splenomegaly was observed in HeLa cell-treated mice (Table 3).
Tumor formation of inoculated human cells can be detected by immunostaining the injection site tissue sections of animals with a human-specific antibody (12). No human mitochondrial antigen expression was observed at the injection site in the vehicle control, hUCB-MSCs, or MRC-5 cell-treated groups, while the HeLa cell-treated group showed high human mitochondrial antigen expression in tumors at the injection site (Fig. 5).
Mesenchymal stem cells are a promising tool for cell therapies because they are easily sourced from various tissues and have properties of tissue revascularization and repair. Previous non-clinical and clinical studies have reported on the therapeutic value of MSCs (13?16). However, some studies have reported adverse effects of MSCs, including tumor growth and mutation into tumor cells (17?20). Moreover, one patient with the neurodegenerative hereditary disorder ataxia telangiectasia treated with human fetal neural stem cells by intracerebellar and intrathecal injection developed a multifocal brain tumor of non-host origin. This suggested that the tumor was derived from the transplanted neural stem cells (21). These reports indicate the importance of investigating the tumorigenicity of MSCs for their use in clinical applications.
In this study, we evaluated the tumorigenicity of hUCB-MSCs
With increasing passages of stem cell lines, there is increased potential for chromosomal aberrations, a hallmark of tumor formation (9). The hUCB-MSCs in this study were used at passage 6 and had no evidence of tumorigenicity, suggesting that hUCB-MSCs may be chromosomally stable at least up to passage 6 under our culture conditions, as they were not prone to malignant transformation. In agreement with our results, Ra
In our 13-week tumorigenicity study in which hUCB-MSCs were transplanted into female BALB/c-nu/nu mice, there were no tumor formation-related findings in body weight, clinical signs, gross findings, organ weight, hematology, or macro- and microscopic examination. However, all HeLa cell-treated mice developed tumors. These findings correlate with the clinical observations and macro- and microscopic examinations. Our results obtained from
According to immunohistochemical analysis, no human mitochondrial antigen expression was observed in the vehicle control and hUCB-MSC-treated groups, indicating a lack of human cell persistence. However, the tumors observed in the HeLa cell-treated mice likely originated from the inoculated HeLa cells based on the detection of human mitochondrial antigen expression.
In this study, tumorigenicity was studied after 13 weeks. However, when allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSCs were injected intravenously into baboons, high amounts of MSC DNA were detected in the kidney, lung, thymus, liver, gastrointestinal, and skin tissues until 19 months post-treatment. Moreover, hAdMSCs survived in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency for 17 months after subcutaneous injection and differentiated into fibroblasts of the subdermic connective tissue and mature adipocytes of fat tissue at the injection site (26). These reports suggest that the duration of this study might have been insufficient. Therefore, a long-term study is required to validate these findings.
In conclusion, our data show that hUCB-MSCs have no
Hematology after transplanting hUCB-MSCs, MRC-5 cells, and HeLa cells in BALB/c-nu mice
Parameter | Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | hUCB-MSC | MRC-5 | HeLa | |
WBC (× 109/L) | 3.45 ± 2.443 | 4.56 ± 1.722 | 3.36 ± 1.260 | 61.80 ± 166.819 |
RBC (× 1012/L) | 10.62 ± 0.584 | 9.90 ± 0.855* | 9.37 ± 2.030 | 9.91 ± 1.237 |
HGB (g/dL) | 1.59 ± 0.98 | 14.0 ± 1.46** | 14.1 ± 3.10 | 13.7 ± 1.78** |
HCT (%) | 51.5 ± 2.72 | 49.0 ± 4.55 | 46.5 ± 10.10 | 46.0 ± 5.33** |
MCV (fL) | 48.6 ± 1.68 | 49.5 ± 0.79 | 49.5 ± 1.08 | 46.6 ± 3.41 |
MCH (pg) | 14.9 ± 0.46 | 14.2 ± 0.93 | 15.1 ± 0.36 | 13.9 ± 1.27* |
MCHC (g/dL) | 30.7 ± 0.68 | 28.6 ± 2.23** | 30.4 ± 0.65 | 29.8 ± 0.71** |
PLT (× 109/L) | 1256 ± 205.0 | 1214 ± 519.4 | 1170 ± 208.4 | 1519 ± 426.1* |
RET (%) | 512.6 ± 384.77 | 477.7 ± 205.50 | 347.4 ± 99.68 | 561.8 ± 179.57 |
NEU (%) | 1.57 ± 0.835 | 2.29 ± 0.709 | 1.77 ± 0.560 | 56.81 ± 154.338* |
LYM (%) | 1.73 ± 1.641 | 2.01 ± 1.016 | 1.42 ± 0.786 | 1.26 ± 1.843 |
MON (%) | 0.04 ± 0.030 | 0.05 ± 0.028 | 0.04 ± 0.018 | 0.81 ± 2.413 |
EOS (%) | 0.06 ± 0.035 | 0.10 ± 0.072 | 0.09 ± 0.105 | 2.28 ± 7.024 |
BAS (%) | 0.01 ± 0.008 | 0.02 ± 0.015 | 0.01 ± 0.013 | 1.19 ± 3.664 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD.
**Significant difference compared to the control (
Macroscopic findings with abnormal lesions after transplanting hUCB-MSCs, MRC-5 cells, and HeLa cells in BALB/c-nu mice
Parameter | Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | hUCB-MSC | MRC-5 | HeLa | |
No. of animals | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
?Mass in injection site | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
?Mass in thoracic cavity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Splenomegaly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Microscopic findings after transplanting hUCB-MSCs, MRC-5 cells, and HeLa cells in BALB/c-nu mice
Parameter | Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | hUCB-MSC | MRC-5 | HeLa | |
No. of animals | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
?Inflammatory cell infiltration | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
?Inflammatory cell infiltration | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
?Extramedullary hemopoiesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
?Extramedullary hemopoiesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
?Cardiomyopathy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
?Inflammatory cell infiltration | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
?Alveolitis | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
?Hemorrhage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
?Subcapsular cell hyperplasia | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
?Corticomedullary vacuolation | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
?Extramedullary hemopoiesis | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
?Erosion/ulcer | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
?Extramedullary hemopoiesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
?Inflammtory cell infiltration, granulocytes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
?Giant cell infiltration | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
?Tumor mass/HeLa cells, subcutaneous | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
?Tumor mass | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
?Keratin cyst | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |